налобный фонарь;источник света: светодиоды;световой поток: 700 лм;максимальное время работы: 12 ч;водозащита, класс водозащиты IPX-4
Обзор:Налобный фонарь Petzl Tikka. Обзор Налобник охотничий Petzl Tactikka + RGB обзор и тесты
With 700 lumens of power, sets the for night trails! It is intelligent, and entirely devoted to performance.
During activity, with REACTIVE LIGHTING technology, NAO analyzes ambient light and instantly adjusts the brightness to the needs of the athlete.
Налобный фонарь nao автоматически регулирует в зависимости от окружающих условий.
Used by professional ultra-runners, hikers, campers, and herpers across the globe, Petzl has become the ultimate standard in outdoor headlamp technology over the years, and recently in 2016 and 2017 there have been some updates to already great products like the Petzl Nao 2 has been upgraded the new NAO+ (Plus).
All Petzl NAO Rechargeable Reactive Lighting Headlamp - 575 Lumens come programmed with REACTIVE LIGHTING technology, adjusting your lighting settings to the always changing environment.
Light built into the LED headlamp sense surroundings and current light available before adjusting the output.
Simple and ultra-compact, the Жмите headlamp offers 300 lumen brightness and a flood beam for proximity lighting and some movement.
Its self-adjusting retractable cord, a Petzl patent, makes it extremely compact, and offers several possibilities for wearing or mounting.
Shop for the NAO+. Why the Petzl Reactik+?
The Reactik is so named because of the reactive lighting mode that it shares with the NAO. The + stands for the fact that can sync it to phone with bluetooth.
Overview Petzl is one of, if not THE most popular headlamp brand with trail runners.
I have read many reviews out there on both the TIKKA RXP and the NAO, but not one review I have found can tell me which one would work for me.
Налобный фонарь Petzl NAO E36AHR 2 Petzl NAO R36AHR 2 - обновленная версия флагмана серии Performance от Petzl. Еще больше яркости.
Petzl NAO 2 575 Lumen Head Torch Review 2 Posted Gear & More Gear продолжить чтение Gizmo Reviews A couple of weeks ago, I posted a review the AP Pro Series Lumen Head which packs a lot of punch for it’s £25 price tag but unfortunately it didn’t really work too well for trail running.
e36_nao_e365010c (020212) (ru) РУССКИЙ. Налобный фонарь с usb-заряжаемым аккумулятором и. автоматической регулировкой ширины мощности луча в.
зависимости от внешнего освещения с помощью сенсора. Overview is one of, if not THE most popular headlamp brand with trail runners.
I have read many reviews out there on both the TIKKA RXP and the NAO, but not one review that I have found can tell me which one would work best for me.
So I decided to do something a different with this review.
Instead, I want to help you decide which is best for you by providing a comparison review.
This review is for those that have already made that decision and are now trying to figure out which one is right for them relative to cost.
Sure, I will provide a basic feature overview, for level-setting purposes, but I want to focus of my time on talking about how they compare so that you can make a more informed decision.
DISCLAIMER: Nothing to note.
I have NO affiliation with Petzl at the time of publishing this review.
Product Overview TIKKA RXP left and NAO right Before I briefly introduce each lamp, I want to talk about why I chose to compare the TIKKA RXP and NAO.
Also, as I said earlier, this review is for those that have already decided to go with Petzl.
This helps to maximize battery life by allowing the lamp to provide you with only the amount of light you need.
This allows the individual to determine the light output in the various modes catering to your unique preferences while also fine tuning the battery life.
The TIKKA RXP is designed to balance a good amount of light output with a light, compact design.
It has a single strap, which fits around the side of the head and splits on the back of the head to Tandberg Ultrium LTO3 (433216) Tandberg create a more secure fit.
The NAO separates the light unit from the battery pack, with the battery sitting on the back of the head.
Additionally, it also incorporates another two straps that go over the top of the head on each side.
The NAO provides a better fit for multi-sport use, especially when wearing a helmet, but I found it to be a bit too much while running.
With the battery pack in the back, the four head straps, and the power cable running between the lamp and battery, I felt that there was just too much going on.
As a side note, if you happen to run with an Orange Mud hydration pack like I do, the battery pack kept hitting my water bottle.
The TIKKA RXP, although it may look bulky from the front, it is actually not too large or obtrusive.
I found it to be quite comfortable, especially since the strap runs behind the lamp which Картридж Konica TN-514K some cushioning on your forehead.
If you prefer a more minimalist feel, the TIKKA is definitely the way to go.
Battery OS by Petzl allows you to create custom lighting profiles which drastically impact the battery life.
In testing, I decided to stick with the standard lighting profiles in order to maintain consistency and keep it simple.
I found the battery life to be consistent with what is published on the Petzl website within 20-30 minutes.
The NAO performed better here in similar modes, offering over an hour of extra time versus the TIKKA.
For the level of light output that I personally prefer, I could almost certainly create a custom light profile that would get through most summer nights on a single charge with the NAO.
By comparison, the TIKKA would require a backup lamp or battery for similar overnighters.
If changing batteries is a big issue for you, then the NAO would definitely be better for overnighters.
The TIKKA, on the other hand, may be better suited for briefer periods of darkness, such as runs that take place during daylight hours where you are only starting or finishing with a bit of darkness.
Lighting I feel like the lighting is the most defining difference between the two.
At 215 lumen max, the TIKKA provides what I believe to be sufficient lighting for most typical trail running purposes.
The light output provides ample brightness and distance, with the light coverage being mostly centered in front of перейти runner.
TIKKA RXP Reactive Light Mode The NAO, by comparison, could probably be used to guide planes in for a night landing.
You can see from the photo that not only does the are Чип для картриджей плоттеров Epson Stylus Pro 7700/9700, 7890/9890, 7900/9900, Yellow (T5964/T6364/T your project out to a further distance, but it is also has significantly better side-to-side coverage.
NAO Reactive Light Mode One thing I did notice is that the reactive light sensor seems to be A LOT more sensitive in the NAO.
The light would flicker constantly in fog or from my breath on a really cold night.
As far as use, the TIKKA pretty sufficient on well-established trails.
I feel like the NAO may be a bit overkill in most cases unless you happen to get lost or do a bit of bushwhacking, in which case the added light would be helpful.
It either felt too tight or was too loose.
The TIKKA RXP was much simpler to dial in, which I attribute to its split strap and lighter weight.
If you look to other sports, источник статьи NAO would definitely provide a better fit, especially when wearing a helmet where the TIKKA would not work at all, but since my sole sport is trail running, I tested it only in that scenario.
So to recap: Conclusion In testing both lamps, I can definitely understand the cost justification between the two, but like almost anything, it will depend on your individual needs.
For me, as a pure trail runner a pretty conservative one at thatI ended up liking the TIKKA a bit better.
As such, my preference leans slightly toward the lighter, minimal fitting TIKKA RXP.
However, for those that are more adventurous than I am, the NAO offers some great upgrades in terms of light output, battery life, and flexible fit for multi-sport athletes.
If there are any instances where a lot of light output would be important to you, the NAO would probably be worth the extra money on that merit alone.
If you like this post and would like to stay up to date when future gear reviews, race reports, and other related posts are released, please follow my Facebook page at!
Joe, Thanks for the thorough write-up.
These sorts of head-to-head-comparisons are really useful when it comes to choosing a light.
I work for Petzl, am also a pretty active runner, and have a lot of experience with both lights.
I wanted to point out that the NAO comes with an optional top strap it looks like a black ribbon with a plastic slider on it.
Try it out; I prefer the fit of the NAO to the TIKKA RXP with this top strap attached.
When you are running all night in a race situation, the better light output of the NAO in terms of both distance and peripheral vision, gives one a edge.
For example, markers can be seen farther out and you get источник статьи much better feel of the overall upcoming terrain.
Even the additional bulk of the NAO creates нажмите для продолжения advantage.
I wear glasses and find the fact the bezel is positioned farther out in front of your eyes eliminates any glare caused from dust on your lenses.
For non-racing situations, I think the TIKKA RPX offers more than adequate light for tackling any terrain.
John Evans Lake City, UT I agree that the sensor on Nao is lot more sensitive than Tikka.
But this leads to the question — is the battery life on Tikka compromised by this?
Just one question: does tikka rxp change the light beam and flood automatically as soon as your head turn from near to far like nao?
By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here:.